Know where IT really stands before committing the next budget.
Structured workshops and evidence review produce a defensible heatmap, the red flags that matter, and the strategic decision leadership needs to make next.
Runs on the Galactus assessment platform: anchored questions, evidence-based scoring, and red flags that override averages. Repeatable yearly with a delta report. See how our assessments work
60 anchored questions · 6 scored domains · benchmark vs Belgian mid-market
Suspect the quickest win is what you pay your vendors? See the Vendor & Contract Audit
The mandate starts with the decision, owner, time window, and evidence that could change the answer.
Scope, exclusions, evidence access, and uncertainty are made explicit before conclusions are presented.
Sven leads the work directly and closes with clear ownership, decisions, and next actions.
Build the baseline
A structured line from leadership concerns and verified evidence to red flags, a defensible heatmap, and the decision that matters next.
Trigger
Use an IT Health Assessment when leadership can see cost, risk, delivery, or resilience problems but lacks a reliable baseline for deciding what to do first. It turns broad concern into a bounded executive question.
Evidence
Structured interviews are tested against available policies, budgets, contracts, inventories, architecture, service data, and operational evidence. Conclusions distinguish what is demonstrated, what is incomplete, and what remains unverified.
Materiality
A reassuring overall score cannot hide a material continuity, security, ownership, or delivery failure. Critical findings are raised separately so leadership sees what can change the decision immediately.
Decision
The result connects domain health, material red flags, quick wins, and structural priorities to one next decision: stabilize, invest, transform, investigate further, or stop a weak initiative.
Decision dossier
The useful boundary is visible before the work begins: the decision, the evidence, what is excluded, and what happens next.
Whether leadership should stabilize, invest, transform, or investigate further—and in what order.
IT strategy and governance, organization and people, applications and data, infrastructure and security, vendors and cost, continuity, delivery, and the evidence available for each conclusion.
A penetration test, statutory audit, detailed implementation design, or legal opinion. Specialist testing can be scoped separately when a finding requires it.
Policies, budgets, contracts, inventories, architecture records, service and incident data, project reporting, restore evidence, and direct stakeholder interviews or observation.
Leadership receives a prioritized decision view and can stop, deepen a finding, or move into a separately scoped advisory or execution mandate.
Timing
3-4 weeks
Delivery owner
Every mandate is led directly by Sven Van Roosenbroek. Specialist involvement, when needed, is made explicit in scope.
Commercial model
Fixed fee for a defined facilitated assessment scope.
Thirty minutes is enough to establish fit, the right depth, and the next responsible step.